WITNESS STATEMENTS, THE WEATHER AND THE DISTRICT JUDGE…

The the observations by District Judge Etherington reported by John Hyde in the Law Society Gazette deserve repetition and the widest audience possible. (The Readers’ comments  on the article also make for interesting reading).

THE GAZETTE REPORT

The District Judge was speaking at a recent Law Society conference.

‘Time and time again I see, particularly in personal injury or RTA cases, there is no sensible narrative about where the duty of care lies and what caused the accident. It is the simple building blocks of a witness statement and it’s not good enough,’ said Etherington.
‘They are more interested in what the weather was or how long the ambulance took to arrive. They have not applied their mind to actually what the accident is about – does this witness statement prove liability? If you read the statement and can’t be satisfied then something is wrong.’
Etherington said he had one recent case where the claimant firm produced a single letter from the client as evidence in chief, then sought almost £2,000 in costs for the preparation of witness statement.
‘There was an absolute disconnect between the work that was done and the schedules,’ he added.

GIVE YOURSELF A BAD NAME…

The report of the speech  goes on:-

  • There are areas when you can give yourself a bad name.
  • The task is given to the most junior members of staff who are not qualified.
  • Counsel were often left hoping that the judge would ask certain questions to get certain facts in front of them.

RECOMMENDED FURTHER READING (BY THE JUDGE)

The Judge tweeted a link on Twitter to a post on this blog which  he mentioned in the talk and that highlights the Chancery Guide to Witness Statements

RELATED POSTS ON WITNESS STATEMENTS

There are numerous posts on witness statements on this blog.  Two of the most widely read are:

  1. Witness statements: The Chancery Guide: Something for us all.
  2. Drafting witness statements that comply with the rules: a checklist too important to ignore.

In relation to the lawyer’s duty:-

A blatant commercial plug

If you want to get it right first time then you need to consider this

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: