THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH: COMMENTS IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: THE SIGNATORY CANNOT HIDE BEHIND THE DRAFTSMAN

The signing of a statement of truth is now an everyday event in litigation. With documents signed by clients, or by lawyers on behalf of their clients. Recent cases highlight the significance of the statement of truth. It is important that familiarity does not lead to contempt. Remember a false statement of truth is contempt.

OBSERVATIONS IN AKRAM

In The Queen on the application of Akram -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 1359 (Admin) Sir Brian Leveson considered a case where a principal of a solicitor’s firm had signed a statement of truth in an application. He personally attested that the grounds of the application were true.  In a later letter of explanation he stated he did not see the application and it was prepared by a caseworker.

THE JUDGMENT ON THE STATEMENT OF TRUTH
  1. The first is the statement of truth. In Kadyamarunga [2014] EWHC 301 (Admin), the Administrative Court stated at paragraph 29 the following about the importance of statements of truth in immigration cases:
“29 … The purpose behind a Statement of Truth is that the party certifies the accuracy and truth of the matters advanced and is thereby less likely to advance speculative, fanciful or false statements. If the party is cross-examined upon the evidence veracity can become an issue by virtue of the Statement of Truth.”
  1. The statement of truth is not an irrelevant mantra or mere verbiage. This Court has now on a number of occasions reiterated the substantial importance attached to qualified lawyers being in a position diligently and carefully to scrutinise applications made to the Court. In Awuku (No 2) & Others (10th December 2012), the then President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Sir John Thomas, stated:
“It is not sufficient for an application to be made by a caseworker without scrutiny by a qualified lawyer.”
  1. That observation was made in the context of an application to the Court on an ex parte basis. However, in our view, it applies equally to all applications to the High Court. If, in a given case, an application is drafted by a trainee or caseworker, then it is of high importance that it should be overseen by an experienced lawyer and that a statement of truth in the name of that experienced lawyer should accurately reflect the fact that the lawyer in question takes ownership and responsibility of the facts and matters set out in the application.”

RELATED POSTS

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: